Rent-a-crowd on Twitter

I’m not what they call a ‘Twitterholic’ – I think I only cracked the 30 followers mark the other day. But I do spend a lot of time working with it, and I’ve started to pick up on the underhanded tactics of some of the bigger Twitter profiles…

In these social times, the amount of Twitter followers you have has a heavy influence on your social standing, but as I recently learnt, this isn’t a trustworthy measure of popularity.

Fake Twitter profiles

For just $50, you too can be followed by thousands of beautiful women who really exist, umm…

While fluttering around Twitter the other day, I noticed that an agency I follow suddenly had a huge Twitter following – we’re talking a 5,000 people plus increase.

Why try when you can buy?

Interested at the sudden increase and all the new followers, I took a closer look to see what on earth this company could have been tweeting that ± 5,000 people would follow them in one day! And then I found my answer about 6,000 followers in: they’re all lingerie models, and even Tara Reid was following them under a pseudonym – it’s amazing!

Of course this was obviously the result of the Twitter phenomenon of businesses buying followers…

After doing some investigation, I found many websites on the net that sell you followers at a minimal fee, depending on the type of followers you want. If you just want the basic Twitter egg follower, expect to pay about £10 per 1,000. The more ‘upperclass’ followers, like the blonde models, are about £15 per 1,000.

The price of fake Twitter profiles

Appalled cheetah is appalled

Appalled cheetah is appalled

But what does this actually do for you besides making your Twitter following look unrealistic? Let’s be honest – nothing.

Our approach has always been to create an organic following of like-minded people who actually care about what you have to say. For example, we recently tweeted a download from our site through Mike’s profile, and instantly we saw about 7 downloads.

Now Mike’s profile has around 10,000 followers; the profile in question retweeted this to their almost 20,000 followers – and there wasn’t a single response.

The truth is, these bought followers are usually dummy or dormant profiles.

So what is the point?

Twitter following increase

Twitter following increase – seems legit!

A quick look at these profiles reveals that most of them have never tweeted, have thousands of follows, but hardly any followers.

A healthy profile will have a good balance between followers and follows, and also a good tweet rate. A big following isn’t necessarily important when it comes to influence; it’s about who is following you – it’s the quality of your following that makes you influential.

You may only have 400 followers, but if your followers are important in your area or line of work, and they’re engaging with you regularly, then you have a great deal of influence.

Tara Reid fake Twitter profile

Tara Reid, is that you?

The point here is that people make a choice to follow you; it’s important that in any industry, you build a following who are interested in what you have to say.

Fake it till you make it?

It’s the people (read individuals) that have decided to follow you that are important.

Buying Twitter followers is like hiring a ferrari and rocking up to your High School reunion – seriously, just don’t do it. Those who fake it to make it on Twitter have missed the point completely.

Referee holds out red card

I call foul.

It’s crazy to think that up to 46% of the Twitter followers of companies could be fake profiles generated by bots. Basically, unless you’re in the league of the celebs below, your massively inflated Twitter following is just going to look ridiculous.

Highest followings on Twitter

  1. Lady Gaga – 26 million
  2. Justin Bieber – 24 million
  3. Katy Perry – 22 million
  4. Rihanna – 21 million
  5. Britney Spears– 18 million
  6. Barack Obama – 17 million
  7. Shakira – 16 million
  8. Taylor Swift – 15 million
  9. Kim Kardashian – 15 million
  10. Youtube – 14 million.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

About Darren Young

Darren studied and qualified in graphic arts in South Africa. He applied his trade in London as well as in Durban, South Africa, during which time he spent working on several major international brands, before deciding to pursue his own path within the graphic design industry, he now finds his home within the walls of digitlab. His main focuses are on advertising, brand building and marketing. "Value has a value only if its value is valued" Bryan Dyson - former CEO of Coca-Cola Google +
  • Sandra Valentim

    This had me chuckling! Absolutely classic.

  • Kari

    Absolutely true… I’d rather have a few real, engaged followers than a bunch of bots ! Good article!

    Apparently the same thing goes for facebook pages – i recently did some research for a client who wanted to get more fans – and you can buy fans for your page. I suppose if you’ve got the money to invest in that kind of thing it may work to boost your credibility when you first start up. Like in those first few weeks when you only have 12 likes or 10 followers – it is kind of embarrasing in a way… and it may even appear to people visiting your page/profile that this can’t be the official page for the company and click away…?
    I’ts also quite depressing when you spend time crafting articles and posts; researching and finding interesting content to share and you just get zero response; and a few hours later your inspiring and life-changing post has moved down the feed into obscurity…
    I’ve seen many clients abandon their blogs, twitter pages and facebook pages because of it – you just feel like you’re standing in a massive room full of people engaged in conversation, waving your arms for attention and getting none :)
    It’s challenging to break into the conversation;
    do you guys have any tips on that?

    • http://www.mikesaunders.co.za Mike Saunders

      Hi Kari

      It’s always tempting to begin with to buy fans or followers in order to build credibility. However the biggest downside to this that that the ‘fans’ don’t actually share content (or read it). As Darren was saying they are mostly dummy profiles.

      I would suggest investing the money into an interesting and creative advertising campaign that will leverage the viral nature of Facebook advertising. At the end of the day, a targeted approach to building followers will build a community of people who are actually interested in your “hand waving”.

      Owning numbers never actually equates to better engagement or more people listening. Developing create content almost always means people will listen.

      Hope this makes sense.

  • xdoomx

    Cool article. I thought I’d add something small to it as it may be kind of relevant. Aside from Klout’s relevancy being debated, I’ve found that keeping my ‘followers’ list clear of fake/retarded accounts boosts my Klout score. At least that’s what I attribute to the 60-65 scoring I’m normally on with my 850 or so followers. I make a point to screen every single one, if it’s fake or merely some weird business selling products I report it as spam. Sorry but that’s not what twitter is for – I declare so, haha!
    End result is a relatively ‘reputable’ list of followers, or at least the ratio of ‘real’ people to crap ones is that much higher.
    I can’t say this is a tactic that an account with fast growing followers could attempt to keep up with but it’s worth considering I think. Also consider the impact this has on the algorithms twitter uses to suggest ‘who to follow’ – essentially your free advertising section.
    In summary, do your part to ‘make the internet a better place’ and it kinda pays off, report those bots and spammers!

    • Darren Young

      Thanks for your comment Brandon, making the internet a better place is just part of what we do:)

  • http://www.mikesaunders.com Mike Saunders

    Looks like an agency just got caught buying followers for themselves and their client. Very sad to see this: http://www.2oceansvibe.com/2012/08/16/are-sas-digital-agencies-buying-themselves-and-their-clients-fake-twitter-followers/

  • Pingback: Online engagement leads to online influence

  • Pingback: Online engagement leads to online influence | SNID Master in Social Networks Influence Design

  • Glen Bo

    Twitter is a vanity campaign as it is. Depending on which account i am using either in entertainment or business regardless Facebook still gets the most engagement however Twitter gets the most notoriety in terms of specific people engaging. I guess it comes down to what you putting out there and what you’re hoping to achieve.But the law of the land is always that content is king.